February 2007

By Lynn K. Neuner and Benjamin D. Bleiberg

In the fall of 2006, the Second Circuit ruled on appeals from the jury trials in two huge insurance cases: SR International Business Insurance Co., Ltd. v. World Trade Center Properties, LLC, 467 F.3d 107 (2d Cir. 2006) (“Swiss Re”), and Olin Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, 468 F.3d 120 (2d Cir. 2006). Both cases went to a jury verdict in 2005 against fairly overwhelming odds. Commentators have widely observed that jury trials are a disappearing breed. In 2002, only 1.8% of civil cases in federal courts and only 0.6% of civil cases in state courts went to jury trial. See Marc Galanter, The Vanishing Trial: An Examination of Trials and Related Matters in Federal and State Courts, J. Empirical Legal Stud. 1 (3), 459-570 (2004); Brian J. Ostrom, et al., Examining Trial Trends in State Courts: 1976–2002, J. Empirical Legal Stud. 1 (3), 755-782 (2004). Moreover, both cases define high stakes, mega-insurance litigation: complex fact patterns, major corporate policyholders and insurers, billions of dollars in insurance coverage, and disputes closely watched by the press and public. Given this context, it is fairly extraordinary that the parties in Swiss Re and Olin let a jury of “peers” determine the outcome of their disputes. The trial proceedings and appellate review in these cases are worthy of study for insurance litigators hoping or planning for a jury trial of their own.

Subscribers: click here for the full story

Non-Subscribers: click here to subscribe

Pay per view ($15.00)