|
|
|
|
Articles from Related Newsletters
Landlord Liability For Tenants Trading In Counterfeit GoodsCommercial Leasing Law & StrategyIn addition to targeting counterfeiters, copyright and trademark holders have started going after commercial landlords whose tenants deal in fake merchandise. It is felt that this new strategy is needed in part because the counterfeiting retailers possess very few assets that can be seized and liquidated to compensate the copyright or trademark holder.
Navigating Your Lease Through a Sea of LiensLJN's Equipment Leasing NewsletterEquipment lenders and lessors face specialized issues when the asset is a vessel. This article describes proposed legislation to expand opportunities for lease financing of vessels.
Court of Appeals Affirms Owner Occupancy Rights Under Rent StabilizationNew York Real Estate Law ReporterIn its June 3, 2008, decision in Pultz v. Economakis, the New York State Court of Appeals unanimously ruled that there is no limit on the number of rent-stabilized units an owner can attempt to recover for owner occupancy. The ruling was a major victory for rent stabilized landlords.
Special Issue: Telecommuting: The Legal Risks of TelecommutingEmployment Law StrategistThis article focuses on key legal duties engendered by telecommuting arrangements; the significant legal risks triggered by regular or periodic work-at-home arrangements; and practical steps employers can take to mitigate these risks.
Other Business Law Newsletters
Franchising Business & Law Alert Archives
Top Stories
![]() We're sorry. Your computer must be equipped with a browser capable of rendering HTML 4.01 and running JavaScript. In your browser, you must enable JavaScript. In addition, you should enable style sheets.
|
Headlines
Canada: What Are the Rules in Ontario's 'Neverland'?The Canada-based, Louisiana-flavored Bâton Rouge franchise system features ribs, beef, and fish in a casual-dining atmosphere, with about 20 franchised restaurants operating in Québec and Ontario. One of the Ontario locations is the battleground for the case to be outlined in this article: 4287975 Canada Inc. v. Imvescor Restaurants Inc. et. al.
Canadians Tackle Disclosure Documents and Other Franchise MysteriesIn Canada, franchise disclosure documents (“FDDs”) are not reviewed by any government agency. It is up to the franchisor to prepare and deliver the document correctly, failing which the franchisee can, for a limited period of time, send in a rescission notice.
Franchisors May Have Standing to Seek to Quash Subpoenas Directed to Third PartiesWhat can a franchisor do if some of its franchisees or business partners (who are not parties to the litigation) are slapped with broad and burdensome subpoenas from disgruntled franchisees or potential franchisees in litigation? In many cases, the answer may be nothing. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally do not allow a party to seek to enforce the rights of others (many states have analogous rules, as well).
Court WatchCA Supreme Court: No 'Narrow Restraint' Exception to Prohibition on Covenants Not to Compete
News BriefsThe latest news from the franchising world.
October Issue in PDF Format
|
| |
|
|
